Strategy to implement RapidArc® using HD120™MLC for irradiation of whole pelvis and lower para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma

Arun Chairmadurai 1, Harish Chandra Goel, Vasu Ganesan, Vikraman Subramani 1, Sandeep Kumar Jain 1, Vikash Kumar 1

Abstract


Purpose: To compare the utility of RapidArc® technique with mono or dual isocentre using high-definition 120 multileaf collimator (HD120™MLC) for irradiation of whole pelvis and lower para-aortic lymph node (PALN) in cervical carcinoma.

Methods: Ten patients having more than 22-cm treatment target length were delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions by RapidArc® technique using mono or dual isocenter. Dose distribution characteristics were monitored using various indices. Doses to critical organs were also compared for the sparing effects.

Results: Conformity and dose-gradient indices for mono or dual isocenter plans were comparable. However, mono-isocentric plan decreased the heterogeneity index (0.07±0.01) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (0.08±0.01; p<0.05). Mean and maximal doses to various critical organs remained comparable. The mean dose to bowel bag was significantly reduced (p<0.05) in mono-isocentric plan (18.78±5.18 Gy) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (19.20±5.27 Gy). Mono-isocentric plan required 1.3 times higher exposure time than the dual-isocentric plans but reduced the overall treatment time by eliminating intra-fraction patient shift that is inevitable in dual isocenter plan.

Discussion: Feasibility of mono-isocentric RapidArc® plan using HD120™MLC for irradiation of whole pelvis and PALN relied on ‘Maximum Leaf Span’, which restricted the ‘leading-leaf’ to surpass the ‘trailing-leaf’ beyond 15-cm. This difficulty was overcome by truncating the field size and fixing the jaws at dedicated positions in mono-isocentric plan.

Conclusion: The strategy used in mono-isocentric plan enhanced the utility of RapidArc® using HD120™MLC and also minimized the intra-fraction set-up variations and overall treatment time.

Keywords


extended-field radiotherapy; Jaw Tracking; HD120™MLC; RapidArc; Jaw optimization methods

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2017; 136 (5): E359-86.

Aalders J, Abeler V, Kolstad P, et al. Postoperative external radiation and prognostic parameters in stage I endometrial carcinoma: Clinical and histopathologic study of 540 patients. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 56(4): 419-27.

Berman ML, Keys H, Creasman W, et al. Survival and patterns of recurrence in cervical cancer metastatic to periaortic lymph nodes (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study). GynecolOncol 1984; 19(1): 8-16.

Potish RA, Twiggs LB, Adcock LL, et al. Paraaortic lymph node radiotherapy in cancer of the uterine corpus. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65(2): 251-6.

Potish RA, Dusenbery KE. Enteric morbidity of postoperative pelvic external beam and brachytherapy for uterine cancer. Int J RadiatOncolBiol Phys 1990; 18(5): 1005-10.

Mell LK, Mehrotra AK, Mundt AJ. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy use in the U.S., 2004. Cancer 2005; 104(6): 1296-303.

Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, et al. Clinical outcomes of definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy with fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography simulation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 77(4): 1085-91.

Chen CC, Wang L, Lu CH, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes and toxicity in endometrial cancer patients treated with adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy or conventional radiotherapy. J Formos Med Assoc 2014; 113(12): 949-55.

Verma J, Sulman EP, Jhingran A, et al. Dosimetric predictors of duodenal toxicity after intensity modulated radiation therapy for treatment of the para-aortic nodes in gynecologic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 88(2): 357-62.

Cozzi L, Dinshaw KA, Shrivastava SK, et al. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2008; 89(2): 180-91.

Zhai DY, Yong Y, Gong GZ, et al. Rapid Arc radiotherapy for whole pelvic lymph node in cervical cancer with 6 and 15 MV: A treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT. J Radiat Res 2013; 54(1): 166-73.

Qiao LL, Cheng J, Liang N, et al. A comparative dosimetric study of volumetricmodulated arc therapy vs. fixed field intensitymodulated radiotherapy in postoperative irradiation of stage IBIIA highrisk cervical cancer. Oncol Lett 2016; 11(2): 959-964.

Desai D, Srinivasan S, Elasmar H, et al. SU-E-T-78: A Study of Dose Falloff Gradient in RapidArc Planning of Lung SBRT. Med. Phys 2015; 42: 3349.

Small W, Jr, Winter K, Levenback C, et al. Extended-field irradiation and intracavitary brachytherapy combined with cisplatin and amifostine for cervical cancer with positive para-aortic or high common iliac lymph nodes: Results of arm II of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0116. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011; 21: 1266–75.

Paddick I. A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans: Technical note. J Neurosurg 2000; 93 Suppl 3: 219-22.

Nakamura JL, Verhey LJ, Smith V, et al. Dose conformity of gamma knife radiosurgery and risk factors for complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 51(5): 1313-9.

James A Tanyi, Paige A Summers, Charles L McCracken, et al. Implications of a high-definition multileaf collimator (HD-MLC) on treatment planning techniques for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): A planning study. Radiat Oncol 2009; 4: 22.

Akpati H, Kim CS, Kim B, et al. Unified dosimetry index (UDI): A figure of merit for ranking treatment plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2008; 9(3): 2803.

R Development Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org.

Jung-In Kim, Park JM, So-Yeon Park, et at. Assessment of potential jaw-tracking advantage using control point sequences of VMAT planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014 Mar 6; 15(2): 4625.

Zhang W,Chen J , Zhai T , et al. SU-E-T-125: Application of Jaw-Tracking Function in VMAT for Upper Thoracic Esophageal Cancer. Med. Phys 2015; 42: 3360.

Fung AYC , Enke CA, Komanduri M, et al. Effects of field parameters on IMRT plan quality for gynecological cancer: A case study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2005; 6(3): 46-62.

Xu F, Wang J, Bai S, et al. Interfractional and intrafractional setup errors in radiotherapy for tumors analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography. Chinese Journal of Cancer 2008; 27: 10, 372-376.

Vieillot S, Azria D, Lemanski C, et al. Plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) and conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in anal canal cancer. Radiat Oncol 2010; 5: 92.

Huang B, Fang Z, Huang Y, et al. A dosimetric analysis of volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy with jaw width restriction vs 7 field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for definitive treatment of cervical cancer. Br J Radiol. 2014; 87(1039): 20140183.

Rossi M, Boman E, Skyttä T, et al. A novel arc geometry setting for pelvic radiotherapy with extensive nodal involvement. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2016; 17(4): 73-85.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24294/irr.v0i0.535

Refbacks



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.