Topographic evaluation of sacroiliac joints by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with axial spondyloarthritis
Vol 5, Issue 2, 2022
VIEWS - 438 (Abstract) 185 (PDF)
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the imaging features of spondyloarthritis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac (SI) joints in terms of topography (in thirds) and affected margin, since this aspect is rarely addressed in the literature. Methods: Cross-sectional study with MRI (1.5 T) evaluation of the SI in 16 patients with diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis regarding the presence of acute (subchondral bone edema, enthesitis, synovitis and capsulitis) and chronic changes (erosions, subchondral bone sclerosis, bone bridging and fatty replacement), performed by two radiologists, blinded to clinical data. MRI findings were correlated with clinical data including age, disease duration, medications, HLA-B27, BASDAI, ASDAS-VHS and ASDAS-PCR, BASMI, BASFI, and mSASSS. Results: Bone edema pattern and erosions showed predominance in the upper third of SI (p = 0.050, p = 0.0014, respectively). There was a correlation between the time of disease and structural changes by affected third (p = 0.028-0.037), as well as the presence of bone bridges with BASMI (p = 0.028) and mSASSS (p = 0.014). Patients with osteitis of the lower third had higher ASDAS values (ESRV: p = 0.011 and CRP: p = 0.017). Conclusion: Chronic inflammatory changes and the pattern of bone edema predominated in the upper third of the SI, but there was also concomitant involvement of the middle or lower thirds of the joint. The localization of involvement in the upper third of the SI was insufficient to differentiate between degeneration and inflammation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Mager AK, Althoff CE, Sieper J, et al. Role of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing early spondyloarthritis. European Journal of Radiology 2009; 71(2): 182–188.
2. Rudwaleit M, Van der Heijde D, Khan MA, et al. How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2004; 63(5): 535–543.
3. Weber U, Hodler J, Kubik RA, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of spinal inflammatory lesions assessed by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or recent-onset inflammatory back pain. Arthritis Care & Research 2009; 61(7): 900–908.
4. Rudwaleit M, Jurik AG, Hermann KGA, et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: A consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2009; 68(10): 1520–1527.
5. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: A guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2009; 68(Suppl. 2): ii1–ii44.
6. Carmona R, Harish S, Linda DD, et al. MR imaging of the spine and sacroiliac joints for spondyloarthritis: Influence on clinical diagnostic confidence and patient management. Radiology 2013; 269(1): 208–215.
7. Teles MS, Fernandes ARC, Pinheiro MM, et al. Influência da ressonância magnética da coluna vertebral e das articulações sacroilíacas no manejo clínico de pacientes com espondilite anquilosante (Portuguese) [Influence of MRI of the spine and sacroiliac joints on the clinical management of patients with ankylosing spondylitis]. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 2012.
8. Rennie WJ, Dhillon SS, Conner-Spady B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of spinal inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis: Standard clinical protocols may omit inflammatory lesions in thoracic vertebrae. Arthritis Care & Research: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology 2009; 61(9): 1187–1193.
9. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, et al. The sacroiliac joint: An overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. Journal of Anatomy 2012; 221(6): 537–567.
10. Bowen V, Cassidy JD. Macroscopic and microscopic anatomy of the sacroiliac joint from embryonic life until the eighth decade. Spine 1981; 6(6): 620–628.
11. Puhakka KB, Melsen F, Jurik AG, et al. MR imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology. Skeletal Radiology 2004; 33(1): 15–28.
12. Benjamin M, McGonagle D. The anatomical basis for disease localization in seronegative spondyloarthropathy at entheses and related sites. The Journal of Anatomy 2001; 199(5): 503–526.
13. Braun J, Sieper J. The sacroiliac joint in the spondyloarthropathies. Current Opinion in Rheumatology 1996; 8(4): 275–287.
14. McGonagle D, Benjamin M, Marzo-Ortega H, et al. Advances in the understanding of entheseal inflammation. Current Rheumatology Reports 2002; 4(6): 500–506.
15. Wick MC, Weiss RJ, Jaschke W, et al. Erosions are the most relevant magnetic resonance imaging features in quantification of sacroiliac joints in ankylosing spondylitis. The Journal of Rheumatology 2010; 37(3): 622–627.
16. Resnick D, Niwayama G, Goergen TG. Comparison of radiographic abnormalities of the sacroiliac joint in degenerative disease and ankylosing spondylitis. American Journal of Roentgenology 1977; 128(2): 189–196.
17. Shibata Y, Shirai Y, Miyamoto M. The aging process in the sacroiliac joint: Helical computed tomography analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2002; 7(1): 12–18.
18. Brunner C, Kissling R, Jacob HA. The effects of morphology and histopathologic findings on the mobility of the sacroiliac joint. Spine 1991; 16(9): 1111–1117.
19. Navallas M, Ares J, Beltrán B, et al. Sacroiliitis associated with axial spondyloarthropathy: New concepts and latest trends. Radiographics 2013; 33(4): 933–956.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/irr.v5i2.1756
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.