Addressing climate change adaptation with a stochastic integrated assessment model: Analysis of common agricultural policy measures

Tatiana Ermolieva, Esther Boere, Anne Biewald, Petr Havlík, Aline Mosnier, David Leclere, Hugo Valin, Stefan Frank, Michael Obersteiner, Yuri Ermoliev

Article ID: 913
Vol 3, Issue 1, 2020

VIEWS - 1780 (Abstract) 320 (PDF)


Stochastic agro-economic model GLOBIOM is used to demonstrate how best to design and evaluate the CAP’s financial and structural measures, both individually and jointly, in the face of inherent uncertainty and risk. The model accounts for plausible shocks simultaneously and derives measures that are robust against all shock scenarios; it can thus help avoid the irreversibility and sunk costs that occur in unexpected scenarios.To allow adequate agricultural production, we show that the distribution of CAP funds needs to account for exposure to risks, security targets, and the synergies between policy measures, including production, trade, storage, and irrigation technologies.



Climate change; stochastic integrated assessment model; Common Agricultural Policy; adaptation; robust policies; GLOBIOM

Full Text:



1. Balkhausen O, Banse M, Grethe H. Modelling CAP decoupling in the EU: A comparison of selected simulation models and results. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2008; 59(1): 57-71.

2. Deaton A., Laroque G. Competitive storage and commodity price dynamics. Journal of Political Economy 1996; 104 (5): 896–923.

3. ECONADAPT (2016). ECONADAPT Toolbox: Stochastic modelling for robust decision-making: The Common Agricultural Policy. The Economics of Climate Change Adaptation (ECONADAPT, 603906, EU FP7) Project Report. (,

4. Ermoliev Y, Hordijk L. Global changes: Facets of robust decisions. In: Marti K, Ermoliev Y, Makowski M, Pflug G (eds), Coping with uncertainty: Modeling and policy issue. Berlin: Springer Verlag 2003.

5. Ermoliev Y, von Winterfeldt D. Systemic risk and security management. In Ermoliev Y, Makowski M, Marti K (eds), Managing safety of heterogeneous systems: Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag 2012; 19–49.

6. Ermolieva T, Havlík P, Ermoliev Y, et al. Integrated management of land use systems under systemic risks and security targets: A stochastic global biosphere management model. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2016a; 67(3): 584-601.

7. Ermolieva T, Biewald A, Boere E, et al. (2016b). Overview report on major uncertainties related to climate impacts and socio-economic costs, and policy recommendations related to the effectiveness of adaptation options. The Economics of Climate Change Adaptation (ECONADAPT, 603906, EU FP7) Deliverable 7.3.(

8. European Commission. Adapting to climate change: Towards a European framework for action. White Paper. 1.4.2009 COM (2009) 147 final. Brussels: European Commission.

9. European Commission. Impact assessment guidelines. Brussels: European Commission 2009b. ( regulation/impact/commission_guidelines/docs/iag_2009_en).

10. European Commission. CAP towards 2020 impact assessment: Direct payments.Brussels: European Commission 2011. ( impact-assessment/cap-towards-2020/report/annex3a-d_en.pdf).

11. European Commission. Overview of CAP reform 2014-2020. Agricultural policy perspectives brief. No. 5, December 2013. Brussels: European Commission. (

12. European Commission. Regulation No. 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and amending Annex X to that regulation. C(2014) 1476 final. Brussels: European Commission. (

13. European Commission. The Water Framework Directive and the Floods Directive: Actions towards the 'good status' of EU water and to reduce flood risks 2015. ( COM_2015_120_en.pdf).

14. European Commission (2017). CAP explained: Direct payments for farmers 2015-2020. (

15. European Commission (2017a). Fact Sheets on the European Union – 2017. (

16. European Commission Rural Development 2014-2020. (

17. European Parlament (2010). The single payment scheme after 2013: New approach - new targets. (

18. FAO (2016).

19. Gohin A. Assessing the CAP reform: Sensitivity of modelling decoupled policies. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2006; 57: 415–440.

20. Havlík P, Schneider U, Schmid E, et al. Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets. Energy Policy 2011; 39: 5690-5702.

21. Heal G, Kriström B. Uncertainty and climate change. Environmental and Resource Economics 2002; 22:3–39.

22. Helming J, Peerlings J. Economic and environmental effects of a flat rate for Dutch agriculture. NJAS 2014; 68: 53-60.

23. IAEA. The Role of probabilistic safety assessment and probabilistic safety criteria in nuclear power plant safety. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 1992. (

24. IEEP(2000). The environmental impacts of irrigation in the European Union. A report to Environmental Directorate of the European Commissions. Inst for European Environmental Policy, London, in association with the Polytechnic University of Madrid and the University of Athens. London: IEEP. ( environment/agriculture/pdf/irrigation.pdf).

25. JRC (2015). An EU-wide individual farm model for Common Agricultural Policy Analysis (IFM-CAP). (

26. Koundouri P., Laukkanen M., Myyrä S., Nauges C. The effects of EU agricultural policy changes on farmers’ risk attitudes. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2009; 36(1): 53-7.

27. Mosnier C, Ridier A, Képhaliacos C, et al. Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France. Ecological Economics 2009; 68: 1408-1416.

28. Nelson GC, Valin H, Sands R, et al. Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic responses to biophysical shocks. PNAS 2013; 111: 3274-3279.

29. WHO (1985). Energy and protein requirements.World Health Organization (WHO)Technical Report Series No. 724, Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation. Geneva: WHO.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.