This paper examined the impact of ownership concentration on cash-holding levels, including 4832 Chinese-listed companies. This study employed the Fixed Effects Model and the Generalized Method of Moments for quantitative analysis. This study shows a positive relationship between ownership concentration and cash holdings. Furthermore, ESG can mitigate the direct correlation between ownership concentration and corporate cash holdings. Finally, the impact described above is particularly noticeable for non-state-owned enterprises. In summary, the empirical findings offer a new analytical perspective on the cash-holding decisions of corporations in the Chinese capital market. Furthermore, this study illustrates the importance of ESG in corporate development to mitigate ownership concentration and excess cash holdings. As a result, the findings show that non-financial reporting, such as ESG disclosure, can reduce agency issues, making more accurate assessments of enterprise performance.

1. Liu JJ, Wang Y, Luo SC. Analysis of the cash holding level of enterprises—Based on the perspective of human resource cost. Economic issues. 2022; (11):123-129. doi: 10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt. 2022.11.009

2. Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Corporate governance. Gower. 2019.

3. Shen H, Lin H, Han W, et al. ESG in China: A review of practice and research, and future research avenues. China Journal of Accounting Research. 2023; 16(4): 100325. doi: 10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100325

4. Feng J, Tang S, Zhong J. Can corporate environmental, social, and governance performance influence foreign institutional investors to hold shares?. Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2024; 33(5): 4310-4330. doi: 10.1002/bse.3708

5. Campbell JL. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review. 2007; 32(3): 946-967. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.25275684

6. Malik M. Value-Enhancing Capabilities of CSR: A Brief Review of Contemporary Literature. Journal of Business Ethics. 2014; 127(2): 419-438. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2051-9

7. Greening DW, Turban DB. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & society. 2000;39(3):254-80. doi: 10.1177/000765030003900302

8. Afifa MA, Saleh I, Haniah F. Direct and Mediated Associations Among Ownership Structure, Cash Holdings and Firm Value: The Case of Jordanian Insurance Firms. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective. 2021; 25(4): 471-482. doi: 10.1177/0972262920983989

9. Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal. 2013; 35(1): 1-23. doi: 10.1002/smj.2131

10. Gramlich D, Finster N. Corporate sustainability and risk. Journal of Business Economics. 2013; 83(6): 631-664. doi: 10.1007/s11573-013-0666-4

11. Wanderley LS, Lucian R, Farache F, et al. CSR Information Disclosure on the Web: A Context-Based Approach Analysing the Influence of Country of Origin and Industry Sector. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008; 82(2): 369-378. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9892-z

12. Faulkner W. Faulkner at West Point. Univ. Press of Mississippi; 2002.

13. Dittmar A, Mahrt-Smith J, Servaes H. International Corporate Governance and Corporate Cash Holdings. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2003; 38(1): 111. doi: 10.2307/4126766

14. Haushalter D, Klasa S, Maxwell W. The influence of product market dynamics on a firm’s cash holdings and hedging behavior. Journal of Financial Economics. 2007; 84(3): 797-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.007

15. Ozkan A, Ozkan N. Corporate cash holdings: An empirical investigation of UK companies. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2004; 28(9): 2103-2134. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.08.003

16. Harford J, Kecskés A, Mansi S. Do long-term investors improve corporate decision making?. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2018; 50: 424-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.09.022

17. Fama EF, Jensen MC. Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics. 1983; 26(2): 301-325. doi: 10.1086/467037

18. Lu L, Guo X, Zhao J. A unified nonlocal strain gradient model for nanobeams and the importance of higher order terms. International Journal of Engineering Science. 2017; 119: 265-277. doi: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2017.06.024

19. Liu W, Song M, Kong B, et al. Flexible and Stretchable Energy Storage: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Advanced Materials. 2016; 29(1). doi: 10.1002/adma.201603436

20. Lee JM, Choi KH, Song YB, et al. Intravascular Imaging–Guided or Angiography-Guided Complex PCI. New England Journal of Medicine. 2023; 388(18): 1668-1679. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2216607

21. Ma WX, Huang T, Zhang Y. A multiple exp-function method for nonlinear differential equations and its application. Physica Scripta. 2010; 82(6): 065003. doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/82/06/065003

22. Alghadi MY, Al Nsour IR, Alzyadat AA. Ownership structure and cash holdings: empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2021; 8(7): 323-31. doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no7.0323

23. Mohd BJ, Hayajneh T, Vasilakos AV. A survey on lightweight block ciphers for low-resource devices: Comparative study and open issues. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 2015; 58: 73-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2015.09.001

24. Ramasamy Ramamurthy S, Roy N. Recent trends in machine learning for human activity recognition—A survey. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2018; 8(4). doi: 10.1002/widm.1254

25. Thuong NT. Impact of health insurance on healthcare utilisation patterns in Vietnam: a survey-based analysis with propensity score matching method. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(10): e040062. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040062

26. Agrawal A, Knoeber CR. Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 1996; 31(3): 377. doi: 10.2307/2331397

27. Zhou Y. Basic Theory of Fractional Differential Equations. World scientific; 2023.

28. Young I. Mental models: aligning design strategy with human behavior. Rosenfeld Media; 2008.

29. Morck R, Wolfenzon D, Yeung B. Corporate Governance, Economic Entrenchment, and Growth. Journal of Economic Literature. 2005; 43(3): 655-720. doi: 10.1257/002205105774431252

30. Shleifer A, Vishny RW. A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance. 1997; 52(2): 737-783. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x

31. Johnson S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, et al. Tunneling. American Economic Review. 2000; 90(2): 22-27. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.2.22

32. Gozlugol AA. Controlling Shareholders and Intra‐Group Transactions: A Special Framework. University of Bologna Law Review; 2022. doi: 10.6092/ISSN.2531-6133/15236

33. Casado M, Cauquoin A, Landais A, et al. Experimental determination and theoretical framework of kinetic fractionation at the water vapour–ice interface at low temperature. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2016; 174: 54-69. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2015.11.009

34. Scafarto V, Ricci F, Della Corte G, De Luca P. Board structure, ownership concentration and corporate performance: Italian evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control. 2017; 15(1-2): 347-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.036

35. Liu Q, Tian G. Controlling shareholder, expropriations and firm’s leverage decision: Evidence from Chinese Non-tradable share reform. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2012; 18(4): 782-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.06.002

36. Gupta CP, Bedi P. Corporate cash holdings and promoter ownership. Emerging Markets Review. 2020; 44: 100718. doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100718

37. Tang KT, Ning JL, Wang L. ESG rating and audit report decision of listed companies. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. 2023; 25(2). doi: 10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2023.02.008

38. Li W, Zhu J, Liu C. Environmental, social, and governance performance, financing constraints, and corporate investment efficiency: Empirical evidence from China. Heliyon. 2024; 10(22): e40401. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40401

39. Bilyay-Erdogan S, Danisman GO, Demir E. ESG performance and investment efficiency: The impact of information asymmetry. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2024; 91: 101919. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101919

40. Wang D, Wang Y, Yang J, et al. Managerial Cognitive Bias, Business Transformation, and Firm Performance: Evidence from China. Sage Open. 2021; 11(1). doi: 10.1177/2158244021999156

41. Cheng Z, Masron TA. Economic policy uncertainty and corporate digital transformation: evidence from China. Applied Economics. 2022; 55(40): 4625-4641. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2130148

42. Ding H, Hu Y, Kim KA, et al. Relationship-based debt financing of Chinese private sector firms: The role of social connections to banks versus political connections. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2023; 78: 102335. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102335

43. Zhou X, Liu H. The influence mechanism of ESG performance on corporate green innovation: Evidence based on Chinese A-share listed companies. Financial Statistical Journal. 2023; 6(2). doi: 10.24294/fsj.v6i2.6048

44. Paridhi, Ritika, Kumar R. ESG Practices and Financial Stability in Emerging Market Healthcare Companies: Insights Amidst the COVID‐19 Pandemic. Thunderbird International Business Review. 2024; 66(5): 505-524. doi: 10.1002/tie.22398

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.